The petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the execution petition with liberty to file afresh due to subsequent developments.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; pending miscellaneous applications also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No. 2086/2026 Decided on: 21.09.2026
Monika Mehta …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to file afresh, on account of certain subsequent developments, in accordance with law.
disposed of as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 21st September, 2026(rohit)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
Monika Mehta
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
