Disposed

Rajneesh Kumar v. Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya (Cskhpkvv)

Himachal Pradesh HC16 Sept 2026EX.P./2073/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought execution of a prior High Court order (CWP No.21 of 2026) directing respondents to consider his leave encashment case in light of another judgment (CWP No.10878 of 2025) and release admissible amounts within three months. Respondents' counsel undertook to comply within four weeks if not already done. The court disposed of the execution petition with a direction to comply within four weeks, reserving liberty to revive the petition if the order is not implemented.

What did the court decide?

Execution petition disposed of with direction to respondents to comply with the judgment in CWP No.21 of 2026 within four weeks; petitioner at liberty to revive petition for appropriate action if not complied.

Rajneesh Kumar Vs Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar… — Execution and Attachment | Himachal Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

Execution Petition No.2073 of 2026 Date of Decision: 16.9.2026

¶3

_____________________________________________________________________ Rajneesh Kumar ……...Petiti Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.

¶4

	……...Petitioner
Versus
	…....Respondents

¶5

Coram

¶6

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?

¶7

For the Petitioner: Mr. Radhey Shyam Gaut	am, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Advocates General and Anish Banshtu, Deput respondent No.1. Mr. Prince Chauhan, No.2.	Vishal Panwar, Additional Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. y Advocates General, for Advocate, for respondent
____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J .(Oral)	_______________________

¶8

By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 30.3.2026, passed by coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.21 of 2026, titled Rajneesh Kumar v. Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya and Anr., whereby afore petition came to be disposed of with a direction to respondents/competent authority to consider and decide case of the petitioner in light of judgment dated

¶9

¶10

23.7.2025, passed in CWP No. 10878 of 2025 , titled as Himachal Pradesh Agriculture University Pensioner’s Sabha v. Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya and Anr . Respondents were further directed to release admissible Leave Encashment to the petitioner within a period of three months, failing which, petitioner was held entitled to interest @ 5% from the date of passing of the judgment. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.

¶11

2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents, state that though they have every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of four weeks from today.

¶12

3. Consequently, in view of the fair stand adopted by learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment alleged to have been violated within a period of four weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in

¶13

¶14

accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the

¶15

order/judgment.

¶16

September 16, 2026

¶17

(manjit)

¶18

(Sandeep Sharma),

¶19