Disposed

Sudesh Kumar v. Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya (Cskhpkvv)

Himachal Pradesh HC16 Sept 2026EX.P./2071/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed an execution petition to enforce a High Court judgment directing respondents to consider his case and release leave encashment with interest. Respondents' counsel undertook to comply within four weeks. The court disposed of the petition with directions to implement the judgment within four weeks, granting liberty to revive the petition if not complied.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to implement the judgment in CWP No. 20276 of 2025 within four weeks; liberty to petitioner to revive petition if not complied.

Sudesh Kumar Vs Chaudhary Sarwan… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Himachal Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

Execution Petition No.2071 of 2026 Date of Decision: 16.9.2026

¶3

_____________________________________________________________________ Sudesh Kumar ……...Petiti Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.

¶4

	……...Petitioner
Versus
	…....Respondents

¶5

Coram

¶6

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?

¶7

For the Petitioner: Mr. Radhey Shyam Gautam, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

¶8

By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 30.3.2026, passed by coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.20276 of 2025, titled Sudesh Kumar v. Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya and Anr., whereby afore petition came to be disposed of with a direction to respondents/competent authority to consider and decide case of the petitioner in light of judgment dated

¶9

¶10

23.7.2025, passed in CWP No. 10878 of 2025 , titled as Himachal Pradesh Agriculture University Pensioner’s Sabha v. Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya and Anr . Respondents were further directed to release admissible Leave Encashment to the petitioner within a period of three months, failing which, petitioner was held entitled to interest @ 5% from the date of passing of the judgment. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.

¶11

2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents, state that though they have every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of four weeks from today.

¶12

3. Consequently, in view of the fair stand adopted by learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment alleged to have been violated within a period of four weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in

¶13

¶14

accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the

¶15

order/judgment.

¶16

September 16, 2026

¶17

(manjit)

¶18

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge