Execution petition disposed of after the respondent corporation complied with the directions by deciding the petitioner's representation. Liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for any surviving grievances.
Execution petition disposed of; liberty reserved to petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for any surviving grievances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No. 2034 of 2026. Decided on : 18th September , 2026
Kishori Lal ...Petitioner. Versus HRTC & Ors. ... .Respondents.
Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Learned counsel for the respondent corporation has placed
on record copy of office order dated 01.01.2026 deciding the representation of the petitioner pursuant to the directions issued in the judgment in question.
accordance with law.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
18th September, 2026. (jai)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Kishori Lal
HRTC & Ors.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
