Raham Tullah v. the State of Hp and Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

CWP No. 136 of 2025 Decided on:21.09.2026

_____________________________ Court on its own motion. Vers State of HP & Ors.	___________________________ ……….. Appellant us …..Respondents
______________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Shar Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Whether approved for reporting?1	_________________________ ma, Judge. Negi, Judge
For the petitioner : Mr.	Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. wit Pra Ad Priy Jalt res	Anup Rattan, Advocate General h Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Mr. Pranay tap Singh and Gobind Korla, ditional Advocates General, Ms. anka Chauhan and Mr. Sidharath a, Deputy Advocates General, for pondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Mr. res	R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Abhinav Thakur, Advocate, for pondent No.3.
Mr. Co	Bharat Bushan, Senior Panel unsel, for respondent No.4.
Mr. res	Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for pondent No.5.
______________________________ **Sandeep Sharma, Judge (**oral)	__________________________

While placing on record notification dated 18.09.2026, issued under the signatures of Chief Secretary (Revenue) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that relief, prayed for in the instant petition, stands granted to the petitioner.

1. Careful perusal of aforesaid document, which is taken on record, reveals that His Excellency the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in