Disposed¶10

Naresh Kumar v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC6 Jul 2026CWP/9733/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oral single-judge disposal of a 2026 Himachal Pradesh High Court civil writ petition concerning prisoner parole: petitioner Naresh Kumar's prayer was found already satisfied because the competent authority had, vide order dated 18.06.2026, granted him 28 days parole, as communicated by the Director General, Prisons & Correctional Services on 27.06.2026; petition disposed of as nothing remained to be adjudicated. Bench: Justice Sandeep Sharma. Counsel: Kiran Kumar for petitioner; Rajan Kahol (Addl. AG) with Ravi Chauhan and Anish Banshtu for the State. No statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

No new relief granted by this Court; the relief sought (parole) had already been granted by the competent authority vide order dated 18.06.2026 (28 days parole), and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. ¶10

Naresh Kumar Vs State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.9733 of 2026 Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Naresh Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others ….Respondents __________________________________________________________________ Coram:_

¶3

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶4

For the Petitioner:	Mr. Kiran Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: _______________________	Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates for State. ___________________________________	Advocate and Mr. General, _________
Sandeep Sharma, Jud	ge _(oral)_:

¶5

While placing on record communication dated

¶6

27.06.2026, issued under the signatures of Director General, Prisons & Correctional Services, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that vide order dated 18.06.2026, competent authority has already granted 28 days parole to the petitioner.

¶7

Having taken note of aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds that relief, as prayed for in the instant petition, already stands granted to the petitioner and as such,

¶8