Himani Sharma v. State of Hp and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Short oral disposal by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla (CWP No. 9387 of 2026, decided 19-06-2026, Ajay Mohan Goel, J.) in Himani Sharma v. State of Himachal Pradesh and another. Petitioner's counsel: Sourav Sharma, Advocate; respondents represented by Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Key relief: representation Annexure P-3 to be decided by the Competent Authority within twelve weeks in terms of its contents; miscellaneous applications disposed of. Useful for advocates seeking authority on judicial directions for time-bound disposal of representations/petitions before competent authorities; contains no statutory citations, no case citations, and no discussion of merits.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-3) within a period of twelve weeks in terms of its contents; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.