Disposed¶10

Narvada Devi and Others v. the Hrtc and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC8 May 2026CWP/6617/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Narvada Devi v. HRTC, CWP No.6617 of 2026, Himachal Pradesh High Court, decided 08.05.2026 by Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj (oral). Petition disposed of in terms of Satish Kumar & Ors. v. HRTC & Ors., CWP No.4659 of 2024 (27.05.2024); decision applied mutatis mutandis; adjudication per office memoranda dated 07.02.2015 and 07.03.2020 (typo correction of 07.03.2021); compliance within eight weeks; respondents' counsel raised no objection.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with direction that the decision in CWP No.4659 of 2024 (Satish Kumar & Ors. vs. HRTC & Ors.) be applied mutatis mutandis, with the dispute to be adjudicated on the basis of office memoranda dated 07.02.2015 and 07.03.2020; respondents-Corporation to comply within eight weeks; pending applications disposed of. ¶10

Narvada Devi and Others Vs the Hrtc and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6617 of 2026 Decided on :08.05.2026

¶2

____________________________________________________________ Narvada Devi & others ...Petitioners Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & another ...Respondents ____________________________________________________________ Coram_ Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting?¹ For the petitioners: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Abhijeet Singh Chauhan, Advocate, vice, Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate.

¶3

Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)

¶4

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

¶5

the petitioners would be content, in case the present petition is disposed of in terms of the decision passed by this Court in CWP No.4659 of 2024, titled, Satish Kumar & Ors. vs. HRTC & Ors., on 27.05.2024.

¶6

Learned vice counsel for the respondentsCorporation does not have any objection in case the petition is disposed of, as per the mandate contained in the aforementioned judgment.

¶7

Keeping in view the submissions made by the

¶8

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶9

¶10

learned counsel for the petitioners and also the fact that the dispute raised in the present petition has already been adjudicated upon by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that the decision rendered in the aforementioned judgment shall be applied mutatis mutandis to the facts of the present case. However, it is clarified that the dispute shall be adjudicated on the basis of the office memoranda dated 07.02.2015 and 07.03.2020 (wrongly typed as 07.03.2021 in the aforementioned judgment).

¶11

Let the needful be done by the respondentsCorporation within eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶12

08th May, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge

Narvada Devi and Others v. the Hrtc and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narvada Devi and Others v. the Hrtc and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hpsebl Vs Naresh Kumar

Indri Devi Vs the State of Hp and Others

Irfan Vs State of Hp and Ors.

Krishan Kumar Vs State of Hp and Others

Chet Ram Vs State of Hp and Others

Shyam Singh and Others Vs State of Hp and Others