Rajnish Kumar v. the Hrtc and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
HP High Court, Shimla; CWP No. 4777 of 2026; decided 20.04.2026; Hon'ble Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (oral judgment); petitioner Rajnish Kumar (counsel Rakesh Kumar); respondents Himachal Road Transport Corporation (HRTC) and another (counsel V.S. Kanwar); petition disposed of with direction to competent authority to decide representation Annexure P-1 within 12 weeks by speaking order in accordance with law; no observation on merits; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-1) in light of the averments made therein within 12 weeks by passing a speaking order in accordance with law; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, disposed of accordingly. ¶10