Disposed¶10

Joginder Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC16 Mar 2026CWP/3054/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Joginder Singh v. State of HP and others; CWP 3054 of 2026; HHC 2026:7258; disposal of writ petition on representation; direction to competent authority; Annexure P-4; decision of representation within 12 weeks; speaking order; no observation on merits; Deputy Advocate General Rahul Thakur accepted notice; proxy counsel Oshin Anand Chauhan.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-4) in light of the averments made therein, within 12 weeks, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also disposed of. ¶10

Joginder Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:HHC:7258

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

	CWP No.	3054 of 2026
	Decided on:	16.03.2026
Joginder Singh	…	….Petitioner
Versus
State of HP and others		… Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay M Whether approved for repo	ohan Goel, Judge. rting?¹
___________________________ For the petitioner :	_____________________ Ms. Oshin Anand as Proxy Counsel.	_____ Chauhan, Advocate
For the respondents :	Mr. Anup Rattan, with Mr. Rahul Advocate General State.	Advocate General Thakur, Deputy for respondents –
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge	( Oral)

¶4

Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶5

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner has already represented to the Department with regard to the issue raised in the writ petition, the interest of justice would be served, in case, this petition is disposed of with direction to the competent authority to decide the representation filed by the petitioner Annexure P-4 in the light of averments made therein

¶6

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶7

¶8

2026:HHC:7258

¶9

within some reasonable time.

¶10

Without making any observation on the merit of the case, this writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-4, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand

¶11

disposed of accordingly.

¶12

(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge

¶13

March 16, 2026 ( narender )

Joginder Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Joginder Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Vs the State of Hp and Others

Ghanshyam Vs the State of Hp and Others

Vinod Kumar Vs the State of Hp and Others

Subhash Chand and Others Vs the State of Hp and Others

Nisha Devi Vs the State of Hp and Others

Shiv Ram Vs State of Hp and Others