Disposed¶21

Sanjay Kumar v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC9 Mar 2026CWP/2667/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla; CWP No. 2667 of 2026; decided 09.03.2026; Justice Ajay Mohan Goel; petitioner Sanjay Kumar (counsel Sanjeev Kumar Motta); respondents State of Himachal Pradesh and others (Deputy Advocate General Leena Guleria); undecided representation Annexure P-3; direction to Competent Authority; speaking order; 12 weeks; disposal of writ petition; miscellaneous applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-3), in the light of the averments contained therein, by passing a speaking order within 12 weeks, in accordance with law; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. ¶21

Sanjay Kumar Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:HHC:6293

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶3

CWP No. 2667 of 2026 Decided on : 09.03.2026

Sanjay Kumar

…Petitioner

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh and others

¶8

…Respondents

¶9

Coram

¶10

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶11

For the petitioner	: Mr. Advo	Sanjeev cate.	Kumar	Motta,
For the respondents	: Ms. Advo	Leena cate Gener	Guleria, al.	Deputy

¶12

Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral )

¶13

Notice. Ms. Leena Guleria, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶14

2 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representation (Annexure P-3) with regard to

¶15

the issues raised in the petition, but the same has not been

¶16

decided by the Authority concerned till date.

¶17

Accordingly, as prayed for, this petition is disposed

¶18

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶19

¶20

2026:HHC:6293

¶21

of with the direction that let representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments contained therein, by passing a speaking order, within a period of 12 weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.

¶22

(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge

¶23

March 09, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)

Sanjay Kumar v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagat Ram Vs State of Hp and Others

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of Hp

Kashmir Singh Vs Union of India through Secretary( Home)

Sushma Devi Vs the State of Hp and Others

Rita Guleria Vs the State of Hp and Others

Pankaj Jamwal Vs the State of Hp and Others