A single-line disposal order holding a writ petition disposed of on the grounds that the petitioner's grievance was redressed by an appointment offered during the pendency of the proceedings.
The writ petition and pending miscellaneous applications stood disposed of as the grievance was redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 19836 of 2025 Decided on: 15.09.2026
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rohit Thakur …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Vishal Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during
the pendency of the writ petition, the respondents have offered appointment to the petitioner on 21.08.2026, therefore, the grievance raised by the petitioner in this writ petition has been redressed.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
15th September, 2026 rohit
1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
Rohit Thakur
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
