The petitioner sought withdrawal of the civil writ petition due to a technical flaw, with liberty to file a fresh petition. The court allowed the withdrawal.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause; miscellaneous applications, if any, also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.16348 of 2026 Decided on 18th September 2026 Shri Sikander Singh
…Petitioner
Vs.
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
…Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner : Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Shubham Guleria, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral )
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as
there is a technical flaw in the petition, the petitioner be allowed
to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the
same cause.
2
as prayed for, so also miscellaneous applications, if any.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
(Yogesh Jaswal) Judge
September 18, 2026 (Vinod)
Shri Sikander Singh
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Ajay Mohan Goel
Yogesh Jaswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
