The petitioner, a Superintendent Grade-II in the Revenue Department, challenged a transfer order dated 08.09.2026 to Tehsil Office Jogindernagar. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn after counsel sought permission to withdraw.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.16322 of 2026 Decided on: 18.09.2026
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rebu Devi …..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors .....Respondents
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Petitioner is serving as Superintendent Grade-II in respondent-Revenue Department and feels aggrieved against office order dated 08.09.2026 that transfers her to Tehsil Office Jogindernagar, District Mandi.
After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present writ petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 18, 2026 Judge R.Atal
1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
Rebu Devi
State of H.P. and Ors
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
