Disposed

Madhu Bala v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC18 Sept 2026CWP/16277/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners sought applicability of the Ghanshyam Dass decision. The Deputy Advocate General informed the court that the said decision had been stayed by an order dated 17.08.2026 in LPA No.205 of 2025. Consequently, the court declined to grant the claimed relief at this stage and disposed of the writ petitions with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners' cases within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No.205 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioners' cases within six weeks after adjudication of LPA No.205 of 2025.

Madhu Bala Vs the State of Hp and Others — Service and Employment | Himachal Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.16244 of 2026 alongwith CWP No.16277 of 2026 Decided on: 18^th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. CWP No.16244 of 2026 Vijay Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2. CWP No.16277 of 2026 Madhu Bala …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram

¶3

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?¹ For the Petitioners: Mr. Pranav Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocate, in CWP No.16244 of 2026. Mr. Verender Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, in CWP No.16277 of 2026. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

¶4

1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

¶5

¶6

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶7

Petitioners seek applicability of Ghanshyam

¶8

Dass and Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors² .

¶9

2. Learned Deputy Advocate General has apprised that the aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No.205 of 2025 and other connected matters .

¶10

3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the respective cases of the petitioners within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No.205 of 2025 and in terms thereof.

¶11

The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

¶12

Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 18, 2026 Judge Mukesh

¶13

2 CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024

Madhu Bala v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhu Bala v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases