Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn after petitioner sought liberty to refile with corrected pleadings.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.16234 of 2026
Decided on: 18th September, 2026
Bimla Devi …..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
on account of certain defects in the pleadings, the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law with appropriate pleadings.
Granting such liberty, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 18, 2026 Judge Mukesh
1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
Bimla Devi
State of H.P. and others
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
