Lachham Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others

2. Petitioner seeks applicability of Bir Singh Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.² . It is seen from the record that though the petitioner has preferred a representation to respondent No.2 on 18.03.2026 (Annexure P-12) for the redressal of his grievances, however, the aforesaid representation does not seek redressal of all the reliefs,

¶17

1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

¶18

2 CWP No.19540 of 2025, decided on 11.12.2025

¶19

2

¶20

which the petitioner has primarily claimed in this writ petition.

¶21

3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner.

¶22

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above

¶23

terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

¶24

September 18, 2026 Mukesh

¶25

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

Lachham Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lachham Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases