Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in an appropriate court of law. The High Court granted the request and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate court of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.16214 of 2026
Date of Decision: 18.09.2026
____________ ___________________________________________ Sh. Sarwan Singh & others …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioners seeks
permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, if so advised. Ordered accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 18,2026
(shankar)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Sh. Sarwan Singh & others
State of Himachal Pradesh & others
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
