The High Court of Himachal Pradesh, without examining merits, directed the respondent authority to consider the petitioner's representation for salary release and decide it within four weeks.
Director respondent No.2 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 16030 of 2026. Decided on :15th September , 2026
Sudershan Singh ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ... .Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar and Mr. Amar Dev Sharma, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Notice. Mr. Sikander Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate
General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
aforesaid grievance but the aforesaid representation has not been considered and decided till date by respondent No.2/competent authority.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
15th September, 2026. (jai)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondent authority to consider and decide the petitioner's representation regarding salary release within a fixed time.
Sudershan Singh
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
