Suman Devi Vs the State of Hp and Others

has not been decided till date by the respondents/ competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the

¶19

1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

¶20

2 SLP (Civil) No.10399/2020, decided on 07.08.2023

¶21

2

¶22

respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.

¶23

3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-6) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.

¶24

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above

¶25

terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

¶26

September 15, 2026 Mukesh

¶27

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

Suman Devi v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suman Devi v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases