Disposed

Sharwan Jeet v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC15 Sept 2026CWP/15938/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of three connected civil writ petitions. The petitioners had not filed the mandatory representation required for the redressal of their grievances. The Court allowed the petitioners to file a representation within two weeks. If filed, the competent authority was directed to decide it within six weeks, taking into account the cited judgment "Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. Versus State of H.P. & Ors." The petitions were disposed of on this basis.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner(s) directed to file representation within two weeks; Competent authority to decide within six weeks thereafter.

Sharwan Jeet Vs State of Hp… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Himachal Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15938 of 2026 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 15^th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. CWP No.15938 of 2026 Sharwan Jeet …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2. CWP No.15976 of 2026 Meena Kumari Negi and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3. CWP No.15993 of 2026 Sudesh Kumari …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?¹ For the Petitioners: Mr. Aman Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

¶2

1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

¶3

¶4

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶5

Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional

¶6

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶7

2. Petitioners seek applicability of Inder Singh

¶8

Thakur & Ors. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.² . It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioners have not preferred any representation for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petition.

¶9

3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring a representation(s) within two weeks from today. In case such a representation(s) is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners.

¶10

The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

¶11

Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 15, 2026 Judge Mukesh

¶12

2 CWP No.4830 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matter on 07.04.2025

Sharwan Jeet v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharwan Jeet v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases