Nisha Kumari v. State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners seeking direction to count contract services for increments and benefits. Court disposed petitions directing respondents to pass consideration order per Apex Court timeline.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondents to pass consideration order per Apex Court timeline.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.15916 of 2026 alongwith CWP No.15948 of 2026 Decided on: 15th September, 2026
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. CWP No.15916 of 2026
Nisha Kumari …..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2. CWP No.15948 of 2026
Dr. Tarika Kumari and others …..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and others .....Respondents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether respondents should consider contract services for increments and promotion.
Whether petitions should be disposed of pending Apex Court timeline.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nisha Kumari
- petitioner
Dr. Tarika Kumari
- respondent
State of H.P.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/15916/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court