Vandana Bharti Vs the State of Hp and Others

petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.

¶22

3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.

¶23

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

¶24

September 14, 2026 R.Atal

¶25

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

Vandana Bharti v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vandana Bharti v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases