The petitioner withdrew the writ petition after informing the court that the matter had been settled with respondent No.2. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed and disposed of any pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.15563 of 2025 Decided on : 16.09.2026
Jahir Ali ...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate, District Sirmour, Nahan and Anr.
…Respondents.
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate. For the respondent(s) : Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1/State. Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press the present petition, since the matter is settled inter se respondent No.2 and the petitioner.
disposed of accordingly.
(G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice
(Bipin Chander Negi) Judge
16th September, 2026 (Gaurav Rawat)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes
Jahir Ali
District Magistrate, District Sirmour, Nahan
Respondent No.2
G.S. Sandhawalia
Bipin Chander Negi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
