Dismissed

Rameshwar Singh Chauhan v. State

Himachal Pradesh HC19 Sept 2026CWP/1387/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners sought mandamus to implement government decisions (Annexure P-1 and P-2) for their absorption in the Civil Supplies Corporation and to halt fresh recruitments. The court noted that a prior judgment in CWP No. 6754 of 2012, which covered the matter, had been set aside by a Division Bench in LPA No. 190 of 2015. Since the petitioners' case relied on a connected writ petition (CWP No. 6745 of 2012) that followed the same ratio, the court dismissed the writ petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

Rameshwar Singh Chauhan Vs State — Service and Employment | Himachal Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.1387 of 2013

¶3

Decided on: 19.09.2026

¶4

_________________________________________________________________ Rameshwar Singh Chauhan and Ors ....Petitioners Versus State of HP and Ors …Respondents ________________________________________________________________ Coram_

¶5

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

¶6

1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Sr. Advocate Mr. Prashant Manhans, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General.

¶7

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶8

This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs:-

¶9

“(i) A writ in the nature of mandamus may very kindly be issued and the respondents may kindly be directed to implement Annexure P-1 and P-2 and to adjust the present petitioners as per rules in the Civil Supplies Corporation or in any other Government Departments.

¶10

ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed not to make fresh recruitments in the Civil Supplies Corporation without considering the present petitioners.”

¶11

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes

¶12

¶13

2. Following order was passed in this matter on

¶14

18.11.2016:

¶15

“The matter in issue is though covered by the judgment rendered by learned Single Judge of this Court in CWP No. 6754 of 2012. However, the said judgment has been assailed by the respondents in LPA No. 190 of 2015. List after the decision in the aforesaid LPA.”

¶16

3. During the course of today's hearing, it was

¶17

apprised that the judgment dated 16.05.2015 passed in CWP No. 6754 of 2012 has been set aside in LPA No 190 of 2015 (State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs Shri Manoj Kumar and others), decided on 06.12.2019.

¶18

4. Petitioner’s case is based upon decision rendered in CWP No. 6745 of 2012, since judgment in aforesaid writ petition has been set aside in LPA No. 190 of 2015, following the same ratio, this writ petition is also dismissed.

¶19

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also

¶20

to stand disposed of.

¶21

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

¶22

September 19,2026 R.Atal

Rameshwar Singh Chauhan v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Rameshwar Singh Chauhan v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases