Writ petition concerning a pending representation; the High Court disposed of it by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation within six weeks.
Representation (Annexure P-2) to be decided by the Competent Authority within six weeks in terms of its contents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 11183 of 2026. Decided on : 8th July , 2026.
Uttam Ram ...Petitioner.
Versus HPSEB & Anr. ... .Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral).
Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned counsel appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
the contents therein. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
8th July, 2026. (jai)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Uttam Ram
HPSEB
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
