Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner's counsel received no instructions despite repeated correspondence.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.1071 of 2015
Decided on: 19.09.2026
_________________________________________________________________ Hem Lata Thakur ....Petitioner Versus State of HP and Ors …Respondents
________________________________________________________________ Coram_
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting?
_________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. K.S. Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.1 to 4. Respondents No. 5 and 6 ex-parte.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite repeated correspondence at his end with the petitioner, no instructions have come forth. The petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
September 19,2026
R.Atal
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
Hem Lata Thakur
State of HP
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
