Veena Kumari v. State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
CWP No. 10462 of 2026; High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; decided 03.07.2026 (oral) by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel; petitioner Veena Kumari (advocate: Mandeep Chandel); respondents State of HP and others (Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General); writ petition disposed of with direction that Annexure P-3 representation be decided by competent Authority within 12 weeks by speaking order per law; no statute or precedent cited; no impugned order described.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the competent Authority to decide the petitioners' representation (Annexure P-3) in light of the averments made therein, within 12 weeks, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. ¶¶11