Lalit v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
Short correction/modification order (not a substantive ruling): the earlier order dated 16.06.2026 in Cr.MP(M) No.985 of 2026 is corrected so that the word 'deceased' in its paragraphs 6 and 7 reads as 'victim' for all intents and purposes; Registry directed to implement the correction. Petitioner: Lalit (adv. Preetika Thakur); Respondent: State of Himachal Pradesh (AAGs Rajan Kahol, Vishal Panwar; DAGs Ravi Chauhan, Anish Banshtu). Bench: Sandeep Sharma, Judge; decided 25.06.2026. No statutes or precedent cases cited or discussed.
What did the court decide?
Modification/correction of the order dated 16.06.2026 in Cr.MP(M) No.985 of 2026: the word 'deceased' in paragraphs 6 and 7 thereof to be read as 'victim' for all intents and purposes, with the Registry directed to effect the necessary correction. ¶¶5