Disposed¶2

Bacchan v. State of Hp

Himachal Pradesh HC17 Apr 2026CRMPM/500/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla; Cr. MP (M) No. 500 of 2026; decision 17.04.2026; Sandeep Sharma, Judge; bail petition withdrawal; liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage; status report; ASI Sanjeev Kumar; petitioner Bachan; State of Himachal Pradesh; advocates: Ms. Neha Thakur, Kulwant Singh Gill, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Mr. Anish Banshtu; disposed by consent/withdrawal; no statutory or precedent citations.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the bail petition permitted, with liberty to file afresh at an appropriate stage in accordance with law. ¶2

Bacchan Vs State of Hp — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MP (M) No. 500 of 2026 Date of Decision: 17.04.2026

¶2

------------------------------- Bachan	---------------------------------------------- ...	------------ Petitioner
	Versus
State of Himachal Prad ------------------------------- Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice *Whether approved for rep* -------------------------------	esh …Res ---------------------------------------------- Sandeep Sharma, Judge. *orting?*¹. ----------------------------------------------	pondent ------------

For the Petitioner:	Ms. Neha Thakur, Advocate Kulwant Singh Gill, Advocate.	vice Mr.
For the Respondent: ------------------------------- Sandeep Sharma, J. (O	Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Additional Advocate Generals Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Deputy Advocates General. ---------------------------------------------- ral)	Panwar, with Mr. Banshtu, ------------

¶3

Respondent-State has filed status report and ASI

¶4

Sanjeev Kumar has come present with record.

¶5

After having perused the status report, learned counsel representing the bail petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage, in accordance with law, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly.

¶6

(Sandeep Sharma) Judge

¶7

April 17, 2026

¶8

(shankar)

¶9

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

Bacchan v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bacchan v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pushpa Devi Vs State of Hp and Another

Rajmal Vs State of Hp

Sahil Pojta @ Chinku Vs State of Hp

Charanjeet Arora Vs State of Hp

Sidharth Vs State of Hp

Charan Singh Arora and Another Vs State of Hp and Another