Sukh Ram v. Satish
Case brief
What is this about?
The court condoned a 60-day delay in filing a criminal revision after the respondent raised no objection. The revision was registered and the parties reported a compromise in the underlying cheque dishonour matter. The petitioner was directed to deposit 7.5% of the cheque amount with the Legal Services Authority, following the Supreme Court's direction in Sanjabij Tari vs. Kishore S. Brocar, before the matter would be listed for disposal.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 60 days in filing revision condoned; revision registered; petitioner directed to deposit 7.5% of cheque amount with H.P. Legal Services Authority per Supreme Court precedent.