The petitioner sought withdrawal of the bail petition with liberty to file afresh. The court allowed the withdrawal accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the bail petition with liberty to file afresh at an appropriate stage, if required and desired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr. MP (M) No. 1711 of 2026
Date of Decision: 21.09.2026
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Suni Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------For the Petitioner: Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Respondent-State has filed status report and ASI Kripal Singh has come present with record.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
September 21, 2026 (shankar)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail petition should be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh?
Suni Kumar
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
