Petitioner sought withdrawal of bail petition after status report filed by State. Court granted permission to withdraw with liberty to file afresh.
Permission granted to withdraw bail petition with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr. MP (M) No. 1710 of 2026 Date of Decision: 18.09.2026
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kans Raj ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 .
| ------------------------------------ For the Petitioner: |
----------------------------------------- Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent: ------------------------------------ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) |
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ----------------------------------------------------- |
Respondent-State has filed status report and HC
Sanjeev Kumar has come present with record.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
September 18, 2026
(shankar)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Kans Raj
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
