Disposed¶6

Paramjeet Singh v. State of Hp

Himachal Pradesh HC17 Jul 2026CRMPM/1200/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of criminal miscellaneous petition Cr. MP(M) No. 1200 of 2026 before the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla; petitioner Paramjeet Singh versus State of Himachal Pradesh; permission to withdraw with liberty to file afresh at an appropriate stage; status report filed by Respondent-State; IO HC Ranjeet Singh, Police Station Nalagarh, Police District Baddi, present in person with record; bench: Justice Sandeep Sharma (oral order); decided 17.07.2026; no statutory provisions or precedents cited; no monetary amounts involved.

What did the court decide?

Petition permitted to be withdrawn at this stage, with liberty to file afresh at an appropriate stage, if required and desired. ¶6

Paramjeet Singh Vs State of Hp — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

Cr. MP(M) No. 1200 of 2026 Date of Decision: 17.07.2026

¶3

________________________ Paramjeet Singh State of Himachal Prad	________________________________________ .....Petitioner Versus esh ..…Respondent
________________________ Coram:	________________________________________
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S Whether approved for re	andeep Sharma, Judge. porting?¹
________________________ For the Petitioner:	________________________________________ Mr. N.S. Chandel, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Shwetima Dogra and Ms. Kanika Verma, Advocates.
For the Respondent:	Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for State.
	HC Ranjeet Singh, No.20, IO, Police Station Nalagarh, Police District Baddi, present in person along with record.

¶4

________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

¶5

Respondent-State has filed status report and HC Ranjeet Singh, No.20, IO, Police Station Nalagarh, Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record.

¶6

Having perused status report, learned Senior Counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, at this stage, with liberty to file afresh, at an appropriate stage, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly.

¶7

(Sandeep Sharma) Judge

¶8

17^th July, 2026 Rajeev Raturi

¶9

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

Paramjeet Singh v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paramjeet Singh v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakshak Khachi Vs the State of Hp and Others

M/S Sharma and Co. Vs the Executive Engineer Electrical Division Hppwd

M/S Alone Biotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Integrated Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.

Shanti Pal Vs Himachal Gramin Bank

Kartar Singh Vs Hdfc Bank Ltd. and Another

Bala Dass Vs Central Bank of India