Rajat Lalta @ Golu v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
Short oral order disposing of a criminal miscellaneous petition (Cr.MP(M) No.1014 of 2026) by permitting withdrawal: Rajat Lalta (petitioner; counsel K.S. Gill) sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition against the State of Himachal Pradesh (counsel Rajan Kahol and Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General; Ravi Chauhan and Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General), with liberty to file fresh at an appropriate stage if required and desired. Bench: Sandeep Sharma, J. Decision date 9.7.2026. No statutes or precedents cited; no substantive ruling; useful only to evidence withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh at appropriate stage, if required and desired. ¶6