Gautam Munjal v. State of Hp

Gautam Munjal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Cr.MP No.3749 of 2026 in Cr.MP(M) No.2157 of 2024

21.09.2026 Present Mr. Karan Kapoor and Mr. Ankur Sinha, Advocates, for the applicant/petitioner.

Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State.

By way of instant application, prayer has been made

on behalf of the applicant/accused for modification of the condition contained in order dated 30.09.2024 passed by this Court in Cr.MP(M) No. 2157 of 2024, titled Gautam Munjal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh, whereby this Court, while enlarging the applicant/accused on bail in case FIR No.128 of 2024, dated 27.07.2024, under Section 316 (2) and 324(4) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, registered at Police Station, Dhalli, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, had stipulated that the applicant/accused shall not leave the territory of India without the permission of the Court.

It is averred in the application that since applicant/ accused is in the business of hospitality, he is required to travel abroad frequently in connection with his business and as such, it may not be possible for him to approach this court time and again for seeking permission to travel abroad. It is also averred in the application that otherwise also, dispute, if any, interse parties is purely civil in nature and as such, no prejudice, if any, shall be caused to either of the parties in case