The applicant withdrew the Cr.MP application with liberty to file afresh; no separate opportunity was required. The court disposed of the application. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
Permission was granted to withdraw the application with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Jagdish @ Baba Vs. State of H.P.
Cr.A (C-DB) No. 69 of 2026
14.09.2026Present: Mr. Prem Chand Verma, Advocate, for the appellant-applicant.
Mr. I.N. Mehta, Senior Additional Advocate General, for the respondent-State.
Cr.MP No. 2050 of 2026
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file afresh. It is clarified that no separate opportunity for filing a fresh application
is required. Application is disposed of being withdrawn.
(Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge
(Bhupesh Sharma)
Judge
14th September, 2026
(sushma)
Jagdish @ Baba
State of H.P.
Vivek Singh Thakur
Bhupesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
