Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted permission to withdraw and disposed of the petition along with any pending applications.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No. 928 of 2026 Decided on 15.09.2026
Ashraf Khan @ Achhu & another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & another
....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioners : Ms. Narvada Kashyap, Advocate. For the respondents/State : Mr. Ajit Sharma Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1/State
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, under instructions,
submits that she does not want to press the present petition, at this stage, and seeks permission to withdraw the same. Ordered accordingly.
(Rakesh Kainthla)
Judge
15th September, 2026 (ravinder)
Ashraf Khan @ Achhu & another
State of H.P. & another
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
