The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court observed that respondents have their own remedy. The petition and pending applications were dismissed as not pressed.
Permission to withdraw sought; Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MMO No. 523 of 2026 Date of Decision: 14.09.2026
Bhinder Singh State of H.P. & Anr.
....Petitioner
Versus ....Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Chirag Bhanu Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting.
| For the petitioner | : | Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate. |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondents | : | Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1-State. |
| M/s. Vasu Sood & Amir Khan, Advocates, for respondent No.2. |
Chirag Bhanu Singh,Judge(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under
instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
(Chirag Bhanu Singh) Judge
14th September, 2026 (Shamsh Tabrez)
Bhinder Singh
State of H.P. & Anr.
Chirag Bhanu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
