Disposed¶8

Atul Sain v. State of Hp and Another

Himachal Pradesh HC6 Mar 2026CRMMO/139/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Cr.MMO No.139 of 2026, High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; decided 06.03.2026 by Sandeep Sharma, J. Petitioner Atul Sain v. State of Himachal Pradesh & another. Keywords: proclaimed offender; surrender before Court below; withdrawal of petition with liberty; payment of cheque amount on day of surrender; appropriate orders in accordance with law; pending applications disposed. No statute or precedent cited in the judgment text.

What did the court decide?

Petition permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to surrender before the Court below; pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ¶8

Atul Sain Vs State of Hp and Another — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

Cr.MMO No.139 of 2026

¶3

Date of Decision: 06.03.2026

¶4

____________________________________ Atul Sain Versus	___________________ …….Petitioner
State of Himachal Pradesh & another	… Respondents
____________________________________ Coram:	___________________

¶5

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶6

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ganesh Barowalia and Mr. Verender Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent-State. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):

¶7

Having taken note of the fact that petitioner has been declared as proclaimed offender for his failure to appear before the Court below despite due notice, this Court is of the view that appropriate remedy available to the petitioner is to surrender before the Court below, which has passed the proclamation order.

¶8

Faced with aforesaid situation, learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to surrender before the Court below. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, in the event of the petitioner surrendering before the Court below, the said Court shall take note of

¶9

1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶10

¶11

the fact that petitioner is ready and willing to pay the cheque amount on the day he surrenders. If it is so, the Court below shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶12

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge

¶13

March 06, 2026 (shankar)

Atul Sain v. State of Hp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Atul Sain v. State of Hp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Kumar Vs State of Hp

Rakesh Kumar Vs the State of Hp and Others

Padam Vs State of Hp

Sachin Agnihotri Vs State of Hp

Alok Dhar Dwivedi Vs State of Hp

Manoj Thakur Vs State of Hp