Tula Ram v. Mohan Pyari
Case brief
What is this about?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, Cr.MMO No. 1240 of 2025, decided 06.07.2026, Rakesh Kainthla J (oral). Quashing petition under Section 528 BNSS (inherent powers) against Family Court salary-attachment order dated 06.08.2025 (Principal Judge, Family Court, Kinnaur at Rampur, District Shimla) recovering ₹1,20,000/- from respondent Mohan Pyari's salary via BEEO Pooh for petitioner Tula Ram. Held: alternate remedy under Family Courts Act available; exercise of inherent jurisdiction improper; petition disposed of, petitioner relegated to statutory remedy. Keywords: Section 528 BNSS; inherent jurisdiction; alternate remedy; Family Courts Act; warrant of attachment of salary; BEEO Pooh; Family Court Kinnaur Rampur; no appearance (None/Nemo).
What did the court decide?
No quashing relief granted; the petition stands disposed of and the petitioner is relegated to the remedy available under the law (Family Courts Act); pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.