Prem Chand Sharma v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was adjourned as the petitioner was absent and no representation was made on his behalf.
The appeal was adjourned as the petitioner was absent and no representation was made on his behalf.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.09.2026 Present:
Prem Chand Sharma vs. State of H.P. Cr.Appeal (A-SB) No. 37 of 2026
None for the petitioner.
Mr. K.B.Khajuria, Advocate, for the respondent.
Case repeatedly called but neither the petitioner is
present nor any representation has been made on his behalf; hence, in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 18.09.2026 (ravinder)
Prem Chand Sharma
State of H.P.
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court