Disposed¶17-18

Vijay Kumar v. Pushpa Devi

Criminal Revision – Disposal as infructuous

Himachal Pradesh HC9 Jul 2026Cr.Rev.(FC)/68/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vijay Kumar v. Pushpa Devi & Anr., Criminal Revision No.68 of 2025, High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (Division Bench: Vivek Singh Thakur and Ranjan Sharma, JJ.), decided 09.07.2026 — criminal revision petition disposed of as infructuous following amicable settlement/compromise between the parties in mediation before the learned Mediator, with no objection from respondents; no ruling on merits; no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as infructuous, as prayed, on account of the amicable settlement/compromise between the parties in mediation before the learned Mediator; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also disposed of. ¶17-18

Vijay Kumar Vs Pushpa Devi — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:HHC:27988

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

Criminal Revision No.68 of 2025 Date of decision: 09.07.2026

¶4

Vijay Kumar.		...Petitioner.
	Versus
Pushpa Devi & Anr.		…Respondents.
Coram

¶5

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge.

¶6

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.

¶7

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶8

For the petitioner : Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anil Kumar Manget, Advocate.

¶9

Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has

¶11

been amicably settled in the mediation proceedings, and therefore,

¶12

present petition has become infructuous.

¶13

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that respondents have no objection to the disposal of the petition as having become infructuous in view of compromise arrived at between the parties before the learned Mediator.

¶14

1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes

¶15

-2-

¶16

2026:HHC:27988

¶17