Dismissed¶7
Balak Ram v. Roshan Lal
Himachal Pradesh HCCR.A/502/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissal of criminal appeal for non-prosecution; appellant absent despite service and repeated calls; Balak Ram (appellant) v. Roshan Lal and Ors. (respondents No. 1 to 5) and State (respondent No. 6); Cr. A. No. 502 of 2012; decided 11.03.2026; Rakesh Kainthla, Judge; no statutes or precedents cited; no substantive point adjudicated.
What did the court decide?
The appellant, though served for the day, did not appear and none was present on his behalf despite repeated calls, showing that he did not want to prosecute the matter further; accordingly, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶7