State of Hp v. Vikas Chand
Case brief
What is this about?
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 390 of 2014 Reserved on: 10.09.2026 Date of Decision 18.09.2026 State of H.P. ...Petitioner Versus V & another ...Respondents Coram
Disposed 11 years 9 months after registration.
2026:HHC:39868
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. Revision No. 390 of 2014 Reserved on: 10.09.2026 Date of Decision 18.09.2026
State of H.P. ...Petitioner
Versus V & another ...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioner/ : Mr Tarun Pathak, Deputy Advocate State General. For the respondents : Mr Ashwani Pathak, Senior Advocate, with Mr Dev Raj, Advocate.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge
The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 08.08.2014, passed by the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, HP. (f or short, learned JJB ), vide which the respondents (juveniles before learned JJB) were acquitted of the commission of offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR.R/390/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court