Disposed¶13

Gian Chand v. Nipun Jindal

Himachal Pradesh HC11 May 2026COPC/502/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gian Chand Conductor overstay allowance HRTC contempt non-compliance petition COPC 502 of 2026 judgment 08.12.2025 CWP No. 19228 of 2025 unsigned office order Managing Director HRTC Shimla-171003 analogy of Devender Chauhan proceedings closed notices discharged liberty to revive Himachal Pradesh High Court Romesh Verma decided 11.05.2026

What did the court decide?

Present proceedings closed with notices, if any, discharged; liberty granted to the petitioner to revive the petition in case the grievances raised remain unaddressed. ¶13

Gian Chand Vs Nipun Jindal — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

COPC No. 502 of 2026 Decided on : 11.05.2026

¶3

Mr. Gian Chand Nipul Jindal	...Petitioner. Versus ...Respondent.
Coram *Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ro* *Whether approved for rep*	*mesh Verma, Judge.* *orting?*¹
For the petitioner:	Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondent:	Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate.

¶4

Romesh Verma, Judge(oral)

¶5

The present petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the judgment passed by this Court on 08.12.2025 in CWP No. 19228 of 2025.

¶6

During the pre-lunch session, learned vice counsel for the respondent sought time to obtain instructions in the matter. She has now placed on record an unsigned office order passed by the Managing Director, HRTC, Shimla–171003, which was supplied to her by the Law Officer of the Corporation, wherein it has been stated that the claim of the petitioner, Sh. Gian Chand, Conductor, for overstay allowance for the period served as regular service is tenable. Therefore, the petitioner has been granted the overstay allowance on the analogy of Devender Chauhan.

¶7