Disposed¶16

Abhishek v. Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Himachal Pradesh HC15 May 2026COPC/354/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition (Contempt Petition No.354 of 2026, HHC, decided 15.05.2026, Sushil Kukreja, J.) closed and disposed of after the State, through the learned Additional Advocate General, produced communication dated 05.05.2025 and office order dated 29.04.2026 evidencing compliance by the Deputy Director School Education Kangra (Order No.EDN-KGR-(E-3), Court Case-Speaking Orders 721-26, dated 29.04.2026) with the judgment/orders earlier passed by the Court; petitioner left free to challenge the consideration order dated 29.04.2026 if still aggrieved.

What did the court decide?

The judgment under reference has been duly complied with; therefore no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition. ¶10

Abhishek Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Another — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

( 2026:HHC:17391 )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.354 of 2026 Date of decision: 15.05.2026

¶3

Abhishek		….Petitioner
	Versus
Rakesh Kanwar & another		….Respondents

¶4

Coram:

¶5

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J.

¶6

Whether approved for reporting ?¹

¶7

For the Petitioner: Mr. Sourav Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral):

¶8

Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional

¶9

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents/State and has placed on record communication dated 05.05.2025 along with office order dated 29.04.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the necessary orders in compliance to the judgment/orders passed by this Court, have been passed by the Deputy Director School Education Kangra at Dharamshala, H.P. vide Order No.EDN-KGR-(E-3), Court Case-Speaking Orders 721-26, dated 29.04.2026.

¶10