Amit Kumar v. Rakesh Kanwar and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla; COPC No. 340/2026 decided 13.05.2026 by Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua; Amit Kumar (petitioner, through advocate Anchal Sharma) versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. (respondents, represented by Deputy Advocate General Sikander Bhushan); proceedings closed after Deputy Advocate General placed on record office instructions dated 12.05.2026 from Director School Education conveying consideration of petitioner's case under office order dated 08.05.2026; notices to respondents discharged; liberty reserved to petitioner to pursue surviving grievances in accordance with law; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of; no statute or precedent discussed.
What did the court decide?
Present proceedings closed; notices issued to the respondents discharged; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, disposed of; liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law at an appropriate stage.