The petition was dismissed as withdrawn after the Additional Advocate General showed that the underlying writ judgment had been fully complied with, and the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.1316 of 2026
Date of decision:16.09.2026
Raj Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & others ...Respondents Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge . Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Yamini and Ms. Geetanjali, Advocate, vice counsel. For the respondents : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of the order dated 10.09.2026, whereby the judgment dated 02.07.2026, passed by this Court in CWP No.10744 of 2026 stands fully complied with.
(Romesh Verma) Judge
16th September, 2026 (vt)
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Raj Kumar
Rakesh Kanwar
Romesh Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
