Single Judge closed writ petition seeking parity in judgment of Ghanshyam Dass, staying order after LPA stay, reserving liberty to revive post-LPA disposal.
Petition closed with liberty to revive if grievances remain unaddressed after disposal of letters patent appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
COPC No. 1313 of 2026 Date of decision: 15.09.2026
| Kusuma Devi & another Versus |
...P | etitioners. |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sudha Devi & others |
...Res | pondents. |
| Coram: | ||
| The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 |
||
| For the petitioners : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advo |
cate. | |
| For the respondents : Mr. Baldev Singh Advocate General. |
Negi, | Additional |
| Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral): |
It is contended by the learned Additional Advocate General that the petitioners are seeking parity in terms of the judgment passed in CWP No. 2056 of 2023 , titled Ghanshyam Dass vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others , decided on 21.03.2024.
(Romesh Verma) Judge
September 15, 2026 (Nisha)
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ghanshyam Dass vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & othersReferred¶4
CWP No. 2056 of 2023, Ghanshyam Dass vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, decided on 21.03.2024
State of Himachal Pradesh & others vs. Chunni Lal alongwith connected mattersReferred¶5
LPA No. 205 of 2025, State of Himachal Pradesh & others vs. Chunni Lal alongwith connected matters, order dated 17.08.2026
Kusuma Devi and another
Ms. Sudha Devi and others
Romesh Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
